1:1 AI Workflow Consulting

Your team has the tools.
They’re using maybe 15% of them.

One call. I audit your actual workflow and tell you the 3 things to fix this week, ranked by impact. No theory. No fluff.

60 min
One call
3
Ranked wins
24h
Written plan delivered
$0
If you don’t find it worth it
Consulted forTraycer AI · Kombai
Founders

You're using Claude, Cursor, v0 but still stuck between idea and shipped. Or you know there's a faster way but don't know what it is. I show you the 3 tools that matter for your specific business.

Engineering leads

Your team has Cursor licenses. Nobody wrote the rules file. Nobody set up an MCP. I fix the setup, not the seat.

PMs & designers

You want to ship prototypes without waiting on a developer. One call usually breaks that dependency.

The gap

Most teams I audit are at 15%.

The gap between “we use AI tools” and “we ship 10× faster” is not effort. It’s the rules file nobody wrote, the MCP nobody installed, and the agent that could have caught that 11pm bug but was never wired in.

15% team

Claude Code installed. Used like autocomplete. Bugs found in production, fixed manually. Meetings happen. PRDs written from memory a week later.

Top 5% team

Claude Code with project rules. Context loads itself. PR review agent runs before a human sees it. Every meeting auto-produces a draft PRD. The rep approves, doesn’t type.

One call. Four things.

  • The 3 immediate wins for your specific stack, ranked by ROI
  • A written 90-day action plan, sent the same day
  • Specific setup: which MCP, which rules file, which agent, which model
  • 14 days of async follow-up over Loom

What I actually fix

Real things. Not hypothetical.

The copy-paste loop

Before · ChatGPT tab, paste context, copy answer, tab back, lose context, repeat.
After · Claude Desktop with project rules and MCP. Context loads itself. Drafts land in Linear or Notion without a tab switch.

Replaces~6 hours per week

Cursor as autocomplete

Before · Cursor installed, nobody enabled the agent, nobody wrote the rules file.
After · .cursorrules, docs index, MCP connected to your actual systems. It knows your codebase, not just the internet.

ReplacesThe rewrite-it-5-times loop

PMs waiting on devs

Before · Figma, ticket, wait, review, wait.
After · Working prototype in Cursor or Claude Code. One call usually breaks one blocked sprint permanently.

ReplacesOne blocked sprint

Two formats. One outcome. No retainers.

Best for teams

4-Day Sprint

$1,000
Four 60-minute sessions over 4 days

For founders, CEOs, PMs, or engineers who want to learn agentic coding properly, not just get a one-time audit. By day 4 you can run Claude Code, set up MCP servers, and build workflows yourself.

DM me on X to book

Not sure which one? DM me on X. Tell me what you’re building and I’ll tell you which one makes sense. No pitch.

Who I am

I’m a full stack developer based in Pune. I consult for funded AI companies and build with Claude Code, Cursor, and MCP every day in production. Which means the audit is specific, not generic.

DM me on X — x.com/devloperVivek

Questions, addressed

Is $300 worth it for one hour?
If it removes one hour of manual work per week from one person, it pays for itself in under two months. If after 60 minutes you don't have three concrete things to change, I refund the call.
I'm non-technical. Will this work for me?
Especially you. I'll set things up on your screen during the call so you're not installing things blind. Plain English throughout.
Do you sign an NDA?
Yes. Standard mutual NDA sent before the call.
One call. You’ll know what’s costing you hours by the end of it.
DM me on X to start